inevitably-johnlocked:

teaandforeshadowing:

inevitably-johnlocked:

cumberpaldi:

inevitably-johnlocked:

cantpronounce:

don-gately:

snarrylock:

rebootingcheesecake:

Applying the phone = heart metaphor from ASiB to this scene was a mistake
Now instead of sneaky nipple teasing all I can think about is John reaching inside Sherlock and taking hold of his heart while Sherlock tells him to “be careful” because it’s a fragile little thing and he can’t handle it getting broken:(

ooooh D:

who gave you the right

Oh god

… proof that Sherlock’s heart was taken in Series One. I think it’s interesting that we never actually see him giving back this phone in particular. Can this be paralleled with Irene’s phone? Is there a write up i can read? THESE ARE IMPORTANT QUESTIONS. Sherlock’s vulnerability is a weakness of mine.

Too lazy to write a full-blown meta, but this delicious lingering shot happened after Sherlock realized that love is destructive and it’s better to keep his growing feelings towards John locked up instead

"Can I have my heart back the phone, John, please?”

Oh! I like that, as terribly sad as it is! OH. OH MY GOSH. I just had a thought. Sherlock throws away his phone on the rooftop in TRF, and we don’t know if the one Sherlock has in S3 is the same one (we just assume, but we never saw it given back to him… as an aside, I am STILL ANNOYED that we don’t know what came of that phone! Seems like a huge plot point to leave out!!). So, he had to throw away his heart to complete the mission… I think the next time we see the phone passed to Sherlock, going on this “heart is the phone’ metaphor, it will be John giving his own heart phone to Sherlock.

THIS MEANS THAT MORIARTY SENT HIS HEART TO SHERLOCK TO LURE HIM IN IN TGG

AND THAT JOHN WANTED HIM TO TAKE HIS HEART BACK FROM MARY IN TSOT
"BEFORE SHE COMES BACK" "FOR ME"

NOT TO MENTION THE SET UP OF THIS SCENE LOOKS LIKE JOHN IS LITERALLY REACHING INTO SHERLOCK’S CHEST YOU CAN’T EVEN SEE HIS ELBOW JESUS

AND SHERLOCK ALL BLINKY-LIKE WHEN HE DOESN’T UNDERSTAND (that john wants to love him) LIKE WHEN HE WAS ASKED TO BE BEST MAN

"DON’T WORRY I’LL GET YOU OUT OF THIS (marriage)"

AND THAT THE VERY FIRST THING JOHN DID UPON MEETING SHERLOCK FOR THE FIRST TIME WAS LITERALLY AND WILLINGLY GAVE UP HIS HEART TO HIM.

THIS IS LESS THAN 10 MINUTES INTO THE EPISODE, NOT 15 SECONDS AFTER HE WALKS INTO THE ROOM.


yeshellothisisblog

If we’re still running with this metaphor, technically john have sherlock his heart in the very beginning. Literally, his first lines to sherlock were “here, use (take) mine (my heart)”

I’ve put these two together because you both hit the nail on the head! OMG, this post keeps getting better. I don’t want to hijack this post, so I’m gonna leave it at this :) I’ll start a new post if there’s anything else added :)

This post broke my metaphorical phone.

inevitably-johnlocked:

teaandforeshadowing:

inevitably-johnlocked:

cumberpaldi:

inevitably-johnlocked:

cantpronounce:

don-gately:

snarrylock:

rebootingcheesecake:

Applying the phone = heart metaphor from ASiB to this scene was a mistake

Now instead of sneaky nipple teasing all I can think about is John reaching inside Sherlock and taking hold of his heart while Sherlock tells him to “be careful” because it’s a fragile little thing and he can’t handle it getting broken:(

ooooh D:

who gave you the right

Oh god

… proof that Sherlock’s heart was taken in Series One. I think it’s interesting that we never actually see him giving back this phone in particular. Can this be paralleled with Irene’s phone? Is there a write up i can read? THESE ARE IMPORTANT QUESTIONS. Sherlock’s vulnerability is a weakness of mine.

Too lazy to write a full-blown meta, but this delicious lingering shot happened after Sherlock realized that love is destructive and it’s better to keep his growing feelings towards John locked up instead

image

"Can I have my heart back the phone, John, please?”

Oh! I like that, as terribly sad as it is! OH. OH MY GOSH. I just had a thought. Sherlock throws away his phone on the rooftop in TRF, and we don’t know if the one Sherlock has in S3 is the same one (we just assume, but we never saw it given back to him… as an aside, I am STILL ANNOYED that we don’t know what came of that phone! Seems like a huge plot point to leave out!!). So, he had to throw away his heart to complete the mission… I think the next time we see the phone passed to Sherlock, going on this “heart is the phone’ metaphor, it will be John giving his own heart phone to Sherlock.

THIS MEANS THAT MORIARTY SENT HIS HEART TO SHERLOCK TO LURE HIM IN IN TGG

AND THAT JOHN WANTED HIM TO TAKE HIS HEART BACK FROM MARY IN TSOT

"BEFORE SHE COMES BACK" "FOR ME"

NOT TO MENTION THE SET UP OF THIS SCENE LOOKS LIKE JOHN IS LITERALLY REACHING INTO SHERLOCK’S CHEST YOU CAN’T EVEN SEE HIS ELBOW JESUS

AND SHERLOCK ALL BLINKY-LIKE WHEN HE DOESN’T UNDERSTAND (that john wants to love him) LIKE WHEN HE WAS ASKED TO BE BEST MAN

"DON’T WORRY I’LL GET YOU OUT OF THIS (marriage)"

AND THAT THE VERY FIRST THING JOHN DID UPON MEETING SHERLOCK FOR THE FIRST TIME WAS LITERALLY AND WILLINGLY GAVE UP HIS HEART TO HIM.

THIS IS LESS THAN 10 MINUTES INTO THE EPISODE, NOT 15 SECONDS AFTER HE WALKS INTO THE ROOM.

yeshellothisisblog

If we’re still running with this metaphor, technically john have sherlock his heart in the very beginning. Literally, his first lines to sherlock were “here, use (take) mine (my heart)”

I’ve put these two together because you both hit the nail on the head! OMG, this post keeps getting better. I don’t want to hijack this post, so I’m gonna leave it at this :) I’ll start a new post if there’s anything else added :)

This post broke my metaphorical phone.

(via queenofallthenerds)

holidaywithnuts:

Why is it always ‘queer people are projecting their identities onto characters’ and never ‘straight people are presuming that their identity is the default’?

(via steficek-knedlicek)

sherlockspeare:

I was thinking about the movie Frank, and then this sort of just happened.

(via starlordthenightfury)

Hi all!

I’m still on hiatus (meh, sort of) but last night I rewatched The Unicorn and the Wasp – the episode of Doctor Who where Ten and Donna meet Agatha Christie – and I’m absolutely positive I’m not the first person to suggest this but I realized I desperately need this to happen while Capaldi’s the Doctor and I felt like I needed to put it out into the universe (aka Tumblr) immediately:

1. Moffat writes an episode where Twelve meets Arthur Conan Doyle.
2. Arthur Conan Doyle is played by Mark Gatiss. 

3. Twelve, our cranky Scot, and ACD discuss the TRUE nature of the Holmes/Watson relationship and it’s really funny ahaha gay jokes etc, but what it REALLY is is a reenactment of Moffat and Gatiss’s first conversation about Sherlock when they decided to write their own version.
BONUS POINTS IF THE DOCTOR/DOYLE CONVERSATION HAPPENS ON A TRAIN.
O Moffat, hear my plea.

incurablylazydevil:

If you watch this show carefully, there is a subtext about John drinking. - Steven Moffat

for Clem

The ASiB drinking just kills me, it really does.

(via nehoynehoy14)

Q

Anonymous asked:

sister of Janine Hawkins.... (″・ิ.・ิ)

A

….I stand by it.

loudest-subtext-in-television:

in my head whenever I say deducingbbcsherlock's acronym I say DBBCS without moving my lips, the sound is funny and pleases me

thank you and good night

i require audio clippage.

loudest-subtext-in-television:

Another Moriarty headcanon: James Moriarty isn’t his real name, or maybe just the Moriarty part is fake. He made it up to conceal his legal identity and thought it sounded cool. In TGG they said they checked the yearbooks looking for someone who could have killed Carl Powers and couldn’t come up with anything. I always wondered if they went back and checked again after Jim introduced himself, but I bet they still wouldn’t find him…

His real name is Richard Hawkins, brother of Janine Hawkins. He really hates the nickname Ricky but he loves when you call him Dick. He’s not the Richard Hawkins who makes clarinet mouthpieces but he has mad respect for that line of work (subtextually speaking).

cartopathy:

[thanks to ceywoozle listening to my ideas, and loudest-subtext-in-television for beta reading this sucker]

A recent essay lists arguments summing up problems with TJLC in relation to queer representation on television, and how—should TJLC be real—it would be (and is)…

Really well said. Thank you in particular for pointing out that in the end, it really does seem like many TJLCers and anti-TJLCers are so passionate about this topic for the same reason – a desire for the right kind of queer representation in the media. I think that because the majority of TJLC related posts floating out there are brief (headcanons, gifs, and the like) and are often silly or (knowingly) exaggerated, while the posts that get to the meat of what TJLC really is are long and require a careful read, there’s an understandable misinterpretation of what the “conspiracy” is actually about.

(via allmyfantasiesarethirdperson)